Perio
Reports Vol. 22 No. 7 |
Perio Reports provides easy-to-read research summaries on topics of specific interest to clinicians.
Perio Reports research summaries will be included in each issue to keep you on the cutting edge
of dental hygiene science.
|
Halitosis – a review
Bad breath or halitosis is considered a problem by 50 percent
of the population for which the American public spends
between $1 and $3 billion dollars each year for gums, mints and
other fresh breath products.
Bad breath is caused by either intraoral or extraoral conditions.
Intraoral problems account for 90 percent of bad breath
cases, usually due to accumulated food debris, poor oral
hygiene, poor tongue hygiene, periodontal disease, caries, and
xerostomia. Extraoral causes are infection or disease in other
parts of the body with odors being carried by the blood to the
lungs, where the odor is expelled through the nose and mouth.
There is also a link between gastrointestinal reflux and self-perceived
bad breath.
Bad breath is due to volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) that
are released with the putrefaction of food, breakdown of epithelial
cells, blood, saliva and bacteria. VSC measurements are done
organoleptically, by smelling, gas chromatography or sulfide
monitoring (Halimeter). The greatest source of VSC is often the
dorsum of the tongue.
Brushing, interdental cleaning and tongue cleaning are the
basic approaches to reducing VSCs in the mouth. Chemicals can
be effective in preventing production of VSCs (chlorhexidine
and CPP) or neutralizing VSC (chlorine dioxide and zinc).
Triclosan is also effective in controlling bad breath when combined
with a co-polymer in toothpaste. Essential oils combined
with zinc are also effective.
Halitophobia is a serious condition, believing one has bad
breath despite all evidence to the contrary and these patients
should be referred for counseling.
Clinical Implications: Halitosis is a significant problem
affecting half the population and should be addressed by
dental professionals. Diagnosing, classifying, treating and
monitoring this condition provides a valuable service for
your patients.
Armstrong, B., Sensat, M., Stoltenberg, J.: Halitosis: A Review of
Current Literature. JDH 84: 65-74, 2010. |
|
Hormone fluctuations impact inflammation
In 1948, Dr. Muhlemann (Switzerland) published a
study showing both histologically and clinically that
women with gingivitis experienced increased inflammation
and increased gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) flow
just prior to their menses. Gingival tissues contain receptors
for androgens, estrogen and progesterone, which
have an impact on inflammation.
Researchers at Ege University in Izmir, Turkey monitored
bleeding upon probing (BOP), plaque, GCF and
salivary levels of estrogen and progesterone during a
complete menstrual cycle for 50 young women. Half the
group had clinical signs of gingivitis (bleeding in more
than 50 percent of sites) and the other half were considered
clinically healthy (bleeding in less than 10 percent
of sites). Indices were recorded at three time points:
menses, ovulation and premenstruation.
BOP averages decreased for those with gingivitis
from 60 sites at menses and ovulation to 40 sites at premenstruation.
No differences were seen in the healthy
group at the three different time points. Salivary estrogen
and progesterone levels were higher at the ovulation and
premenstruation time points and lowest during menses.
GCF flow was slightly higher in the gingivitis group
compared to the healthy group, but scores did not vary at
the different time points. GCF levels of the proinflammatory
cytokine IL-6 were elevated in gingivitis patients
at all time points compared to healthy patients.
Clinical Implications: Hormonal changes at various
points in a woman’s menstrual cycle might impact
bleeding upon probing scores. In the future,
researchers should gather probing scores at the same
point in a woman’s cycle when probing and bleeding
upon probing scores are compared over time.
Becerik, S., özçaka, ö., Nalbantsoy, A., Atilla, G., Celec,
P., Behuliak, M., Emingil, G.: Effects of Menstrual Cycle
on Periodontal Health and Gingival Crevicular Fluid
Markers. J Perio 81: 673-681, 2010. |
|
|
Animal model shows perio influence on arthritis
Clinical observations and several research studies suggest
that subjects with severe rheumatoid arthritis are more
likely to also have severe periodontitis and vice versa. The
infection and inflammation of periodontitis is considered
extra-synovial, being outside the bone joints. Just how the
inflammatory response in one part of the body impacts that
in another part of the body is the focus of many oral/systemic
studies. Periodontitis and rheumatoid arthritis share
similar pathogenesis.
Researchers at the University of Adelaide in Australia
designed a proof of concept study to measure the influence
of a periodontal pathogen infection on experimental arthritis
in rats. Polyurethane foam sponges soaked with either
sterile saline or heat-killed Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg)
were surgically implanted into the animals’ upper back/
shoulder area. The study was comprised of six test groups of
six animals each. Groups one and two had sponges in place
for 35 days, either saline or Pg. Groups three and four were
similar to one and two, but these groups all received an
injection near the base of the tail of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which induces arthritis within 14 days. Two concentrations
were used in each group, thus creating four test
groups with induced arthritis.
Implanted sponges were removed after 35 days and analyzed,
showing significant inflammation in the Pg samples
compared to the sterile saline sponges. Changes to the hind
paws of the rats showed the greatest amount of swelling and
redness in the animals receiving both the Pg implanted
sponges and the injection to induce arthritis.
Clinical Implications: This study proves the concept in an
animal model that a Pg infection somewhere else in the
body will exacerbate rheumatoid arthritis..
Bartold, P., Marino, V., Cantley, M., Haynes, D.: Effect of
Porphyromonas Gingivalis-Induced Inflammation on the
Development of Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Clin Perio 37: 405-
411, 2010. |
|
Oral hygiene and Candida colonization
Several factors influence growth of Candida albicans including
xerostomia, dentures or other removal appliances, HIV
infection, a compromised immune system or medications. Poor
oral hygiene has long been suspected to be a factor influencing
Candida colonization.
Researchers at Jordan University of Science and Technology
in Irbid, Jordan, used a rinse technique to measure Candida levels
in the oral cavity of 149 healthy, dentate subjects. Oral
hygiene and gingivitis scores were compared to the presence of
Candida in the rinse and the number of colony forming units
grown on agar plates.
Plaque scores were rated: very good, good, poor and very
poor. There were also four levels of gingivitis: no inflammation,
mild, moderate and severe inflammation.
Similar to other reported findings, Candida was isolated
from 58 percent of subjects. Other levels reported vary between
52 percent to 59 percent.
Oral hygiene was not significantly related to Candida levels.
Increasing age was significantly related to Candida colonization,
while no differences were seen between males and females.
Higher colonization
rates were found in those
who didn’t use dental floss
and smokers. The aromatic
hydrocarbons in tobacco
are a nutrient for yeast cells, which might explain the link with
smoking. Additionally, smoking might increase salivary glucose,
contributing to enhanced yeast growth.
Many contributing factors must be considered for oral
Candida colonization, other than oral hygiene. General health,
existing systemic diseases, medications and the cleanliness of
removal oral appliances from orthodontic retainers to dentures.
Clinical
Implications: Poor oral hygiene is no more likely
than good oral hygiene to affect colonization of oral
Candida organisms.
Darwazeh, A., Hammad, M., Al-Jamaei, A.: The Relationship
Between Oral Hygiene and Oral Colonization with Candida Species
in Healthy Adult Subjects. Int J Dent Hygiene 8: 128-133, 2010 |
|
Smoking inhibits bone regeneration around implants
Bone healing around an implant is a cascade of synthesis and
activation of proteins, growth factors, cytokines and angiogenic
stimulators. This complex process can be altered by some of
the 4,000 toxins found in cigarette smoking.
Nicotine, a potent vasoconstrictor,
reduces blood flow and nutrient delivery
to the implant site. Smoking delays bone
healing by inhibiting proliferation of precursor
cells essential for bone deposition.
Researchers at Guarulhos University
in Brazil evaluated the effects of smoking
on implant integration in a group of 13
smokers (10 or more cigarettes per day
for five years or more) and 11 never-smokers.
Oxidized, screw-type, micro-implants
were used, one for each test
subject. The implants were surgically
placed and a flap sutured over the site.
Most were placed in posterior maxillary
sites. Clindamycin was provided three
times daily for a week to prevent infection.
Two months later, all the implants
were clinically stable. Each implant and
surrounding tissues was removed.
Bone to implant surface was analyzed
finding a significant difference between
smokers and never smokers. The area was
26 percent in smokers and 40 percent in
never smokers. Bone density within the
threads of the implant was 28 percent
for smokers and 46 percent for never
smokers. Bone density just outside the
implant threads was 19 percent for smokers
and 25 percent for never smokers.
Compromised healing was due to the
interactions between smoking and the
immune response.
Clinical Implications: Recommending
implants for smokers should be done
with caution, as smoking has detrimental
effects on bone healing around
implants.
Shibli, J., Piattelli, A., Iezzi, G., Cardoso,
L., Onuma,T., Carvalho, P., d’Avila, S.,
Ferrari, D., Mangano, C., Zenobio, E.: Effect of Smoking on Early
Bone Healing Around Oxidized Surfaces: A Prospective,
Controlled Study in Human Jaws. J Perio 81:575-583, 2010. |
|
Zinc citrate in toothpaste reduces bacteria
Despite the fact that dental disease
begins most often between the
teeth, toothbrushing remains the
primary patient approach to oral
hygiene. Many antimicrobial agents
have been tested in toothpastes,
including chlorhexidine, triclosan,
salts and metals. Most studies measure
clinical outcomes like caries,
gingivitis and oral malodor.
Researchers at West China College of Stomatology at Sichuan University in
Chengdu, China, together with Colgate compared regular Colgate toothpaste
and a zinc citrate toothpaste for reducing oral bacteria. Bacterial samples from
four areas were tested: saliva, tongue, buccal surfaces of the teeth and oral
mucosa. A total of 35 patients, between 18 and 75 years of age, participated in
this 14-day, crossover study. For seven days, subjects all brushed with regular
Colgate toothpaste. On day eight, subjects came to the clinic without brushing
their teeth, for baseline data collection. They were then given either regular
toothpaste or the test toothpaste containing one percent zinc citrate and told to
brush only their teeth, twice daily for two weeks. No other oral hygiene was to
be performed and no gums, mints or mouth rinses.
On day 14, oral samples were again taken prior to toothbrushing. They were
then allowed to leave, to brush their teeth and returned five hours later for
retesting. The entire study was repeated so each subject used both toothpastes.
Both toothpastes reduced bacterial counts, with greater reductions evident
with the zinc citrate toothpaste.
Clinical
Implications: Toothpastes containing zinc citrate appear to
reduce bacterial counts more effectively than similar toothpastes without
zinc citrate. Tom’s of Maine toothpaste contains zinc citrate and is owned
by Colgate.
Hu, D., Sreenivasan, P., Zhang, Y., De Vizio, W.: The Effects of a Zinc Citrate
Dentifrice on Bacteria Found on Oral Surfaces. Oral Health Prev Dent 8:
47-53, 2010. |
|