As minimally invasive dentistry and Caries Management by Risk
Assessment (CAMBRA) guidelines become more commonly
observed in dental practices, glass ionomers represent a useful but
perhaps under-utilized tool for the dentist.1,2 Confusion about the
various types of tooth-colored restorative materials and their characteristics
might contribute to this. While classic formulations of glass
ionomers earned a reputation for being unaesthetic and brittle, the
newer resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) materials have helped
address this issue. Not to be confused with compomers, RMGIs offer
improved aesthetics and wear resistance while still maintaining the
fluoride-releasing properties of traditional glass ionomers. A review
of the characteristics of each of these materials shows that RMGIs are
indeed true glass ionomers, offering the same benefits of GIs while
improving on several weaknesses of the conventional materials.
What Makes a Glass Ionomer?
Originally introduced in the 1970s, glass ionomers consist of an
acid functional polymer, water and fluoroaluminosilicate (FAS)
glass. When combined, these materials react and form an acid-base
material that is self-curing, capable of adhering to tooth structure
and which releases fluoride over time.³ Because these materials are
water-based, they offer the advantage of ion exchange, with fluoride
ions having the ability to move into and out of the material. In
addition to fluoride, GIs also encourage the exchange of calcium,
strontium and phosphate ions, all contributing to remineralization
of dentin.4 An additional advantage that glass ionomers offer over
composites is that they do not necessitate etching to adhere to teeth.
However, as noted above, aesthetics and strength can be an
issue for these materials. Their chemistry makes them vulnerable to
water uptake for at least one week after placement, a lengthy window
of time.5
To address these concerns, 3M ESPE introduced the resin
modified glass ionomer in the early 1990s. This class of materials
adds a polymerizable resin to the formula for a glass ionomer, giving
the material the ability to be light cured. Photopolymerization
can set the material immediately to a depth of 2mm, allowing it to
resist water uptake. Despite this variation in the formula, RMGI
materials retain the defining characteristics of glass ionomers,
including the following:6
- A two-part system of polyalkenoic acid, FAS glass, water
and monomers
- Acid/base setting plus photo initiation
- Pretreatment of cavity with primer or organic acid, (e.g.
polyacrylic acid)
- Adheres directly to pretreated tooth surface
- Ion-exchange adhesion via polyacid interaction
- General ion exchange available
- Sustained fluoride release via acid/base reaction
- Exhibits significant fluoride recharge
Compomers, a combination of composite and glass ionomer
materials, differ from GIs and RMGIs in several respects. These
materials are resin-based, with modifications made to add ion-leaching
glass particles and anhydrous polyalkenoic acid. They are
photo-activated, and their fluoride release levels are significantly
lower than those of GIs or RMGIs.7
Because of their fluoride release capabilities, RMGIs are frequently
used in treatments for both pediatric and geriatric patients. I
personally use them often for geriatric patients, many of whom are
experiencing dry mouth and root caries. For children, an RMGI can
be instrumental in being able to quickly restore an area without the
need for isolation. I also utilize it as a core material, which is useful in
cases with deep decay. For patients with limited financial resources,
glass ionomers can provide an inexpensive treatment option.8
Achieving Consistency with RMGIs
My preferred RMGI material, 3M ESPE Ketac Nano Light-Curing Glass Ionomer Restorative, is classified as a nano-ionomer
for its incorporation of nanotechnology with FAS glass, giving it
unique properties among RMGIs. Typically, a broad range of particle
sizes are incorporated into GI materials, with effects on
strength, abrasion resistance and optical properties. However,
because Ketac Nano restorative includes bonded nanofillers and
nanocluster fillers in addition to FAS glass, its aesthetic properties
are higher than products with varying particle sizes.
Another difference offered by Ketac Nano restorative is its
paste-paste system, as opposed to the powder and liquid components
of other glass ionomers. This results in dispensing that is
more consistent and less messy than powder-liquid products. A
recently introduced Quick Mix Capsule delivery system mixes the
two pastes inside the tip, further simplifying delivery. With the capsule
system, only three steps are necessary to prepare the product,
resulting in significant time savings over a triturated capsule.
The priming system with this material saves steps as well. Most
GIs and RMGIs utilize a polyacrylic acid primer, which serves to
remove the tooth's smear layer and increase "wettability." While
these materials are much less acidic than a phosphoric acid, they
still necessitate a rinse step to remove before application of the
restorative. Ketac Nano reduces a step in this category, as its acid
primer is no-rinse. The material consists of Vitrebond copolymer,
HEMA, water and photoinitiators. The primer is applied to the
tooth surface for 15 seconds, air dried and light cured for 10 seconds.
Once applied, the primer actually enhances the release of
fluoride ions from the restorative material.
In the past, the mix of glass ionomer materials that required
hand mixing or trituration could often be inconsistent and might
lead to reduced physical properties. However, with the improved
delivery system, the mix of Ketac Nano restorative is very reliable,
and I have gained confidence in using the material knowing that it
is dispensed predictably. The clinical strength of the product is
improved with this delivery system as well. Data shows that the
capsule delivery system results in fewer voids than triturated capsules.9 The fluoride release of the material remains high as well,10
and in vitro tests have also shown an artificial caries inhibition
effect, as well as the ability to recharge the fluoride release.
A Material to Consider
Glass ionomers are a class of materials that many dentists have
little experience with, believing them to be difficult to use or unaesthetic.
However, the recent improvements made in the formulation
and delivery of these materials makes them worth a second look.
Depending on the specific material, a glass ionomer can be used in
cases for small Class I, Class III and Class V restorations, as well as
core buildups. They are also useful in treatments of primary teeth,
as a base under composite, a temporary treatment or for treatments
intended to be minimally invasive.11
As I have seen more of the predictability of the latest generation
and delivery system of RMGI, I have felt more confident using it
for a greater variety of indications. While it is not a cure-all for
patients susceptible to caries, its fluoride release helps give extra
reassurance when placing restorations, and its excellent polishability
helps it look more natural. While in the past, glass ionomers
were not often my instruments of choice, I have since discovered
the utility and benefits of these products, and lately find myself
reaching for them more and more.
References
- Featherstone JD, et al. Caries management by risk assessment: consensus statement, April 2002. J Calif Dent
Assoc. 2003 Mar;31(3):257-69.
- Ramos-Gomez FJ, Crall J, Gansky SA, Slayton RL, Featherstone JD. Caries risk assessment appropriate for the age
1 visit (infants and toddlers). J Calif Dent Assoc. 2007 Oct;35(10):687-702.
- 3M ESPE. Ketac Nano Light Curing Glass Ionomer Restorative Technical Product Profile. http://multimedia.
3m.com/mws/mediawebserver?mwsId=66666UuZjcFSLXTtmxTtoXTVEVuQEcuZgVs6EVs6E666666--
- Mount GJ, Tyas MJ, Ferracane JI, Nicholson JW, Berg JH, Simonsen RJ, Ngo HC, A revised classification
for direct tooth-colored restorative materials, Quintessence International 2009; Vol.40, No.8; 691-697
- Mount GJ, Tyas MJ, Ferracane JI, Nicholson JW, Berg JH, Simonsen RJ, Ngo HC, A revised classification
for direct tooth-colored restorative materials, Quintessence International 2009; Vol.40, No.8; 691-697
- Mount GJ, Tyas MJ, Ferracane JI, Nicholson JW, Berg JH, Simonsen RJ, Ngo HC, A revised classification
for direct tooth-colored restorative materials, Quintessence International 2009; Vol.40, No.8; 691-697
- Hewlett ER, Mount GJ. Glass ionomers in contemporary restorative dentistry--a clinical update. J Calif Dent
Assoc. 2003 Jun;31(6):483-92.
- Christensen GJ. Restorative dentistry for times of economic distress. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Feb;140
(2):239-42.
- Boehm A, Brostrom M, Broyles B, Falsafi A, Madsen V, MItra SB, Oxman J, Peuker M, Ton T. Void-Content
and Customer-Satisfaction of Glass-Ionomers: Novel Automix versus Triturated Capsules. IADR General
Session, Barcelona, Spain. July 15, 2010.
- Boehm A, Broyles B, Falsafi A, Madsen V, Mitra SB, Oxman J, Peuker M, Ton T. Comparative Properties of
RMGI Nanoionomer Restorative Delivered via Novel Automix-Capsule. AADR Annual Meeting,
Washington, DC. March 4, 2010.
- 3M ESPE. Glass Ionomer Solutions. http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/mediawebserver?mwsId=SSSSSu7zK1f
slxtU48_B5xmxev7qe17zHvTSevTSeSSSSSS--
|