Perio
Reports Vol. 23 No. 6 |
Perio Reports provides easy-to-read research summaries on topics of specific interest to clinicians.
Perio Reports research summaries will be included in each issue to keep you on the cutting edge
of dental hygiene science.
|
Hospitalization Bad for Oral Health
For hospitalized patients, oral health and oral hygiene are not usually top priorities. Consequently, poor oral
health and hygiene impact quality of life, nutrition and
general health. Poor oral health and hygiene are associated
with hospital-acquired infections, specifically respiratory
diseases with intubated patients.
Researchers at the Eastman Dental Institute in
London, U.K. reviewed the research to determine oral
health changes during hospitalization. More than 9,000
potential records were found in a literature search and of
these 37 full articles were evaluated and five papers fit the
study design criteria for the systematic review.
Four of the studies included patients in intensive care
(ICU) and the other study included both ICU and cardiac
surgery patients. Two studies were from the U.S. and
one each from the U.K., France and Holland. Patients in
three studies were intubated. Oral hygiene for study
patients varied considerably from wiping the mouth with
a sterile cloth or using a sponge swab to using toothbrushes
with toothpaste. Frequency also varied from
twice to six times daily.
Plaque levels were monitored and showed significant
increases during the hospital stay in four of the five studies.
One study reported baseline plaque scores of 23 percent
and 93 percent after 10 days hospitalized. Gingival
inflammation was also reported to increase during hospitalization.
Intubated patients experienced increased
mucositis compared to non-intubated patients.
Clinical Implications: Hospitalization is associated with an increase in plaque and deterioration in oral health. Encourage patients who are hospitalized to maintain oral health or seek the help of dental professionals to ensure good oral health and hygiene during hospitalization.
Terezakis, E., Needleman, I., Kumar, N., Moles, D., Agudo, E.: The Impact of Hospitalization on Oral Health: A Systematic Review. J Clin Perio 3, 2011 |
|
Non-invasive Periodontal Diagnosis
Periodontitis is primarily diagnosed with radiographs and
clinical examinations using periodontal probes to measure
probing depths, attachment levels and bleeding. Going to the
next level, genetic and laboratory tests measure oral microbiology,
one aspect or bacteria at a time. The future will bring noninvasive
modes of diagnosis.
Non-invasive diagnostic methods do not use ionizing
radiation, are not uncomfortable for the patient and do not
manipulate the tissue. Non-invasive diagnostics will provide
information about current disease and also predict disease
progression. Three approaches being investigated are:
infrared spectroscopy, optical coherence tomography and
ultrasound imaging.
Infrared spectroscopy distinguishes between healthy and
diseased tissue by detecting through the tissue chemical bonds
and molecular and sub-molecular profiles. Covalent bonds
vibrate and absorb energy from the infrared light. This information
creates a unique molecular fingerprint of the tissue. If
the disease progresses or treatment is provided, the fingerprint
will change. Infrared spectroscopy analyzes complex biologic
systems, rather than single biomarkers. Infrared spectroscopy
can also analyze gingival crevicular fluid, detecting an entire
spectrum of biomarkers related to various stages of health
and disease.
Optical coherence tomography creates a high-resolution
cross-sectional image of periodontal soft tissues and bone using
low-level laser light. These three-dimensional images capture
micro-structural details of the periodontium without having to
touch the tissue.
Another imaging modality widely studied in dentistry is
ultrasound, producing ecographs of bone and tissue without
radiation to the tissues.
Clinical Implications: One day periodontal disease will
be diagnosed with non-invasive modalities, providing
more information in less time and without discomfort to
the patient.
Xiang, X., Sowa, M., Iacopino, A., Maev, R., Hewko, M., Man,
A., Liu, K.: An Update on Novel Non-Invasive Approaches for
Periodontal Diagnosis. J Perio 81: 186-198, 2011. |
|
|
Disease and Risk Scores Predict Tooth Loss
One goal of periodontal therapy is to stop bone loss and
prevent tooth loss. Calculating a mean tooth loss rate among
those with periodontitis is difficult due to variation in disease
severity among people. Those with the most severe disease
experience the most lost teeth. Those diagnosed with
early periodontitis who receive treatment are less likely to
lose teeth.
Researchers associated with the PreViser diagnostic and
risk assessment system and periodontists in clinical practice
evaluated patients who had periodontal treatment to determine
tooth loss levels, associated disease severity and risk level
at the beginning of treatment.
Nine periodontists using the PreViser system entered data
on a total of 776 patients who received treatment between
1971 and 2003. The average treatment time was 13 years,
ranging from three to 33 years with a total of 980 teeth lost.
The PreViser system provides a disease score from one to 100.
For this study, the disease scores were grouped into nine categories:
health (1), mild periodontitis (2, 3), moderate periodontitis
(4, 5) and severe periodontitis (6, 7, 8, 9). The
majority of subjects, 98.5 percent, were in categories 4 to 9.
No teeth were lost by 61 percent of the group. No one
with a disease score of 1 or 2 lost any teeth. Seven percent lost
four to six teeth (advanced periodontitis group) and two percent
lost 10 teeth or more and they were in disease score categories
8 and 9. The higher the disease score and the risk
score, the greater the tooth loss risk.
Clinical Implications: Diagnosing and treating periodontitis
early provides the best chance of preventing future
tooth loss.
Martin, J., Page, R., Loeb, C., Levi, Jr., P.: Tooth Loss in 776
Treated Periodontal Patients. J Perio 81: 244-250, 2010. |
|
Local Delivery of Statin Drug for Bone Regeneration
The local delivery of drugs sub-gingivally is used to improve
periodontal healing after instrumentation. Several drugs are now
available for local delivery: tetracycline, minocycline, doxycycline,
metronidazole and chlorhexidine.
Delivery systems now include gels, cellulose
fibers, ointments, chips and microspheres.
Researchers at the Governmental
Dental College and Research Institute in
Kamataka, India evaluated a new local
delivery system using a methylcellulose gel
of the statin drug simvastatin. This six month
study evaluated clinical and radiographic
outcomes after scaling and root
planing (SRP) plus the new local delivery
drug or a placebo.
A total of 60 patients with chronic periodontitis participated,
30 in the test group and 30 in the placebo group, each
with one test or control site. After SRP, the 1.2 percent simvastatin
gel (SMV) or the placebo was injected into the pocket areas
using a blunt cannula. No periodontal dressing was used and
patients were instructed to refrain from interdental cleaning for
one week.
Data collection included clinical indices, radiographs and
gingival crevicular fluid (GCF). Plaque reductions were similar
for both test and control groups. Significant healing was evident
in both groups, but the test group showed
more significant probing depth reductions,
attachment level gains and gingival index
reductions than the placebo group. The test
group showed significant bone regeneration
interdentally compared to the control
group. Evidence of the SMV drug in GCF
was measured at all test points, up to and
including day 30.
Clinical Implications: Drugs other than antimicrobials and antibiotics might soon be available in local delivery systems to not only enhance healing but also to stimulate bone regeneration.
Pradeep, A., Thorat, M.: Clinical Effect of Subgingivally Delivered
Simvastatin in the Treatment of Patients with Chronic
Periodontitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Perio 81: 214-
222, 2010. |
|
NovaMin Compared to Potassium Nitrate
NovaMin is an amorphous sodium calcium phosphosilicate that was first developed as a bone regenerative
material for long bone fractures. In smaller particle size, it is now available in dental products to
occlude open dentinal tubules associated with root surface sensitivity.
Researchers at the SDM College of Dental Sciences in Dharwad, India compared a toothpaste
containing five percent NovaMin, a toothpaste containing five percent potassium nitrate and a control
toothpaste with fluoride. Thirty patients with sensitivity volunteered for the study. All received
a prophylaxis and two weeks later, the
study began. Baseline sensitivity was
measured using three tests: tactile with a
dental explorer, air using the air syringe
and cold water by placing melted ice
water on the surface.
Subjects were randomly assigned to
one of the three toothpastes and told to
brush twice daily as usual and to refrain
from eating or drinking for 30 minutes
after brushing. Patients were seen at two
and four weeks to measure sensitivity.
Both the NovaMin and the potassium
nitrate toothpastes reduced sensitivity
compared to the control toothpaste.
NovaMin was more effective than the
potassium nitrate in reducing the subjects'
reported pain on the three sensitivity tests.
Dentin discs were also tested in the lab
by brushing with the three toothpastes
and evaluated for tubule closer after two,
10, 30 and 120 minutes. NovaMin was
the only toothpaste that blocked the
open tubules. Potassium nitrate works
by blocking nerve transmission, not by
blocking tubules, explaining why the
tubules were still open.
Clinical Implications: New toothpastes containing NovaMin provide an alternative choice for patients seeking relief from dentinal hypersensitivity.
Salian, S., Thakur, S., Kalkarni, S.,
LaTorre, G.: A Randomized Controlled
Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy of
Two Desensitizing Dentifrices. J Clin Dent
21: 82-87, 2010. |
|
NovaMin Compared to Potassium Nitrate
and Stannous Fluoride
Hypersensitivity affects as much as 57 percent of the general population.
Desensitizing toothpastes work in one of two ways, either occluding open
dentinal tubules or depolarizing nerve conduction. Fluoride occludes open
tubules and potassium nitrate depolarizes the nerve. NovaMin, a new ingredient
for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity, occludes open dentinal tubules.
Researchers at the Armed Forces Medical Center in Pune, India compared
three desensitizing products: 7.5 percent NovaMin toothpaste (Soothe Rx), five
percent potassium nitrate toothpaste (Sensodent K) and 0.4 percent stannous
fluoride (Colgate Gel-Kam). The 12-week study included 120 subjects who
were sensitive when tested with an explorer along the cervical areas of the teeth.
All received an ultrasonic prophylaxis, followed by a four-week wash-out period
before the study began.
Sensitivity was measured on the facial surfaces of incisors, cuspids and premolars
with a blast of cold air and melted ice dripped on the cervical area from
a micropipette. Subjects reported their pain on a visual analog scale from zero
to 10. Sensitivity was measured at two, four and 12 weeks.
Subjects were randomly assigned to one of the three test groups and
instructed to brush twice daily with their assigned toothpaste and refrain from
eating or drinking for 30 minutes after brushing.
All three test products reduced sensitivity significantly by 12 weeks.
NovaMin was able to reduce the sensitivity earlier and more significantly than
the other two products.
Clinical
Implications: Toothpaste containing NovaMin reduces dentinal hypersensitivity faster than potassium nitrate or stannous fluoride.
Sharma, N., Roy, S., Kakar, A., Greenspan, D., Scott, R.: A Clinical Study
Comparing Oral Formulations Containin 7.5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate
(NovaMin), 5% Potassium Nitrate, and 0.4% Stannous Fluoride for the
Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity. J Clin Dent 21: 88-92, 2010. |
|