Perio Reports Vol. 24, No. 7 |
Perio Reports provides easy-to-read research summaries on topics of specific interest to clinicians.
Perio Reports research summaries will be included in each issue to keep you on the cutting edge
of dental hygiene science.
|
Effectiveness of Subgingival Air Polishing
Air polishing is generally done supragingivally due to the
abrasiveness of the sodium bicarbonate powder on root surfaces
and general tissue trauma. The EMS company introduced a
fine-grain glycine powder that can be used on root surfaces,
restorative materials and soft tissue without noticeable damage.
This new glycine powder allows air polishing to now reach subgingival
areas, making it an alternative to hand instruments for
biofilm removal at periodontal maintenance visits.
Researchers at the University of Washington compared
subgingival plaque biofilm removal on 30 patients using
either hand instruments or air polishing with EMS Air-Flow
glycine powder. Patients had probing depths of 4-9mm
on at least two teeth and detectable levels of Pg and Tf.
Subgingival and oral bacterial samples were measured at
baseline, day 10 and day 90.
Subgingival air polishing was done with a ne wly
designed nozzle with three openings to effectively reach the
entire subgingival area. Each tooth surface was treated for
five seconds. Hand instrumentation was done with curettes
and scalers following no time limit. Both groups rinsed with
chlorhexidine twice daily for two weeks.
Clinically, there were no differences between the test and
control groups at 90 days. Microbiologically, at 90 days,
fewer patients in the air polishing group (73 percent) were
positive for Pg compared to the hand instrumentation group
(93 percent). Air polishing might provide a shift in subgingval
bacterial population. With calculus removal it might be
the entire group.
Clinical Implications: Subgingival air
polishing with glycine powder might
become the treatment of choice for perio
maintenance visits.
Flemmig, T., Arushanov, D., Daubert, D., Rothen, M., Mueller, G., Leroux,
B.: Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Efficacy and Safety of Glycine
Powder Air Polishing in Moderater-to-Deep Periodontal Pockets. J Perio
83:444-452, 2012.
|
Laser Used for Periodontal Maintenance
Supportive periodontal care (SPC) is an integral part of
managing periodontal health. The goals of SPC are to stop
progression of periodontal disease, prevent or reduce tooth
loss and provide early screening for oral cancer and other oral
conditions. Mechanical instrumentation during SPC is done
with hand or power instruments or a combination of both.
The Er:YAG laser has been designed as an alternative or
adjunct to mechanical instrumentation.
Researchers in Germany conducted a multi-center research
study including four German university research sites. The
study began with 78 non-smoking patients, and 58 finished the
26-week study. Clinical and microbiological outcomes were
measured comparing mechanical instrumentation and Er:YAG
laser during SPC appointments. Subjects each had two single
rooted teeth in the same arch with probing depths 5mm or
deeper and bleeding upon probing. Baseline clinical and microbial
measures were repeated at 13 weeks and 26 weeks.
Patients presented after complete periodontal debridement.
One test tooth was treated with the KaVo Key Laser
and the other was treated with the KaVo Sonicflex Sonic
Scaler to remove plaque biofilm. Treatment time was set at
20 seconds per diseased surface for a maximum of two minutes
per test tooth.
No significant differences were observed between the two
groups at 13 or 26 weeks for probing depths, attachment levels
or bleeding upon probing. Baseline attachment levels were
9mm average for both groups and at 26 weeks were 7.5mm
for the laser and 8mm for the sonic scaler.
Clinical Implications: After calculus removal, the laser and the sonic scaler provide comparable outcomes.
Ratka-Krüger, P., Mahl, D., Deimling, D., Mönting, J., Jackmann, I., Al-Machot, E., Sculean, A., Berakdar, M., Jervøe-Storm, P., Braun, A.: Er:YAG Laser Treatment in Supportive Periodontal Therapy. J Clin Perio
39:483-489, 2012. |
VSCs Linked to Periodontal Progression
Volatile Sulfur Compounds (VSCs) are gases released
with the breakdown of proteins that can also be detected
by their distinctive smells. VSCs associated with both
bad breath and periodontal disease include hydrogen
sulfide, methyl mercaptan and dimethyl sulfide. Tongue
coating and periodontal disease release significant
amounts of VSCs.
Researchers at Nigata University in Nagita, Japan followed
a group of non-smoking, elderly Japanese over three
years to determine if VSC scores were predictive of periodontal
disease progression. Subjects were part of a larger
study of 70-year-old Japanese examining the relationship
between oral health and general health.
Dental examinations were completed at baseline and
yearly for three years. Clinical attachment levels and
bleeding upon probing were the key clinical indices
monitored. VSC scores were also recorded. An interview
was conducted to determine oral health and eating and
drinking habits.
Subjects were divided into two groups, those examined
before meals and those examined after meals. After meals
VSC scores were lower than before meal scores. Those who
showed evidence of greater than 3mm of attachment loss
from baseline also showed higher VSC scores.
Those with the highest number of periodontal pockets
measuring 6mm or more also had the highest VSC scores.
The higher the number of teeth with periodontal disease,
the higher the VSC scores. Reports of flossing, regular dental
visits, alcohol consumption and frequency of toothbrushing
did not impact VSC readings.
Clinical Implications: VSC levels might now be considered
a risk factor for periodontal disease and become
part of clinical records regularly collected to monitor
periodontal disease progression.
Makino, Y., Yamaga, T., Yoshihara, A., Nohno, K., Miyazaki, H.: Association Between Volatile Sulfur
Compounds and Periodontal Disease Progression in Elderly Non-Smokers. J Perio 83:635-643, 2012.
|
Adding Patient-centered Outcomes to
Periodontal Therapy
The concept of patient-centered approaches to
health care began in 1948 when the World Health
Organization changed their focus from the absence of
disease to the wellbeing of the patient. Clinical research
focuses on measurable changes in probing depths,
attachment levels and bleeding upon probing. More
recently researchers have begun evaluating the impact of
periodontal therapy from the patients’ perspective.
Researchers at the University of Hong Kong evaluated
both clinical outcomes and patients’ perceptions
immediately following non-surgical therapy and at
three-month intervals for a year. A total of 60 nonsmoking
Chinese adults between the ages of 35 and 65
with moderate to severe periodontal disease participated.
In addition to the usual clinical indices, patients
completed a 14-question oral health-related quality of
life survey. Questions asked about chewing difficulty,
trouble pronouncing words, eating comfort, having sore
spots, feeling embarrassed, avoiding going out, unable
to go to work, etc.
Experienced dental hygienists using local anesthesia
provided non-surgical therapy over four to six visits
completed within one month. Bleeding scores reduced
from 86 percent to 32 percent. The overall mean probing
depth reduced from 3.3mm to 1.8mm. The percentage
of pockets 4mm or deeper was reduced from 31
percent to three percent.
The median quality of life scores began at 17, reducing
gradually to 13 at the end of the year. The average
score for a periodontally healthy person is 4.4.
Clinical Implications: The non-surgical periodontal
therapy you provide your patients results in better
oral health and also improvements in the quality of
life they experience.
Wong, R., Ng, S., Corbet, E., Leung, W.: Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy Improved Oral
Health-Related Quality of Life. J Clin Perio 39:53-61, 2012. |
XyliMelts Keep Mouth Moist Over Night
Xerostomia is caused by medications, CPAP use,
radiation treatment and a variety of diseases.
Lozenges, gels and sprays can manage daytime oral
dryness, but not overnight dryness.
XyliMelts are bi-layer tables with a vegetable
gum adhesive on one side to allow
the disc to adhere to either tooth
surface or tissue. All the ingredients,
including xylitol, will dissolve, providing
oral lubrication.
Researchers at the University of
Washington evaluated the effectiveness
of XyliMelts in a group of 15
subjects with xerostomia. Subjects
were instructed to apply one disc to the
buccal surface of a maxillary first molar or gingiva,
either right or left side after breakfast, lunch
and dinner. Before bed, they were instructed to
apply two discs, one on each side either on the buccal
of the maxillary first molar of the adjacent gingiva.
Subjects were asked to determine how long the
XyliMelt disc lasted during the day and how their
mouth felt each morning for one week.
Baseline stimulated salivary flow was measured
and repeated after one week. No changes were evident
for any of the subjects in their stimulated salivary
flow. Secretion rates ranged from 0.004 to
0.074ml/minute. Average stimulated salivary flow
rates equal 1ml/minute, so these scores are very low.
Oral wetness was measured using a visual analog
scale of zero to 100. Baseline oral wetness scores
recorded upon waking ranged from zero to 50. After
one week, scores ranged from 32 to 92. Discomfort
upon waking scores were reduced from 22-9
Clinical Implications: XyliMelts offer an overnight
as well as daytime remedy for xerostomia.
Burgess, J., Lee, P.: XyliMelts Time-Release Adhering Discs for Night-Time Oral Dryness.
Int J Dent Hygiene 10:118-121, 2012.
|
Probiotics Might be Helpful in Preventing Oral Disease
An estimated 100 trillion micro-organisms call the
human body home. We ingest bacteria in the food we eat
and the water we drink. Fermented foods also provide a
source of micro-organisms: sausages, miso, tempeh, soy beverages,
cheese, yogurt and other fermented milk products.
Probiotics are living micro-organisms that provide beneficial
functions in the digestive tract and also in the mouth. The
term probiotic was introduced in 1965 in an article in Science
Magazine, despite having been advocated for several centuries
before. Probiotic is the antonym or opposite of antibiotic.
Probiotics are live microbial food ingredients beneficial
to health. Prebiotics are non-digestible food ingredients that
selectively stimulate the growth of specific bacteria beneficial
to health. A beneficial mixture of probiotics and prebiotics is
called a synbiotic. Hydrogen peroxide is produced by some
oral probiotics to eliminate the undesirable bacteria and as a
side effect, whiten the teeth. The bacteria used in oral probiotics
are not acid-producing species. Changing the balance
of bacteria in the mouth with specific oral probiotics will
also eliminate the bacteria releasing the volatile sulfur compounds
associated with halitosis.
In the mouth, oral probiotics change the balance of the
microflora to one favoring health and enamel mineralization,
rather than disease and demineralization. There are four key
properties of oral probiotics: 1) binding to dental surfaces,
2) production of antimicrobial substances against oral
pathogens, 3) reduction of inflammatory response and 4)
alteration of environmental conditions of the mouth. Oral
probiotics are delivered to the mouth in gums and mints.
Clinical Implications: Oral probiotics can be an important part of oral health, prevention and fresh breath programs
offered to patients.
VAnilkumar, K., Monisha, A.: Role of Friendly Bacteria in Oral Health - A Short Review. Oral Health Prev Dent 10:3-8,2012. |