by Rhoda P. Kublickis, RDH, MHS
Even though patients might choose to spend money on a Prada purse rather than investing
on maintenance of their children's oral health, it makes you wonder if they really understand
that making a choice in favor of preventive services provided by a dental hygienist has
the potential to last a lifetime. Parents need to be aware of the consequences of keeping
the deciduous teeth in the mouth, therefore allowing for guidance of permanent teeth into
the correct position. If permanent teeth are clean and healthy, it usually results in healthy
bone around teeth, allowing teeth to be kept for a lifetime. Effective prevention services last
longer and are more valuable than any Prada purse!
This message was lost with my grandmother who grew up in
the Philippines. It was too late for prevention when my mother
had a toothache and the dentist gave two choices: fill the tooth
for $4 or extract the tooth for $4. My grandmother's logic was
to extract the tooth, as then it would no longer be in the mouth
to cause pain. Filling the tooth left it in the mouth and perhaps
it would decay again and cause more pain and more expense. By
the age of 17, my mother had no maxillary teeth and wore a
denture. Her mother thought she has made the right decision
for her daughter. It was my mother who broke the cycle of
extractions and ignorance about dental health in our family. As
a child, I remember her brushing her upper denture and telling
us stories of how poor her family was, so poor that my grandmother
could not properly pay for dentistry until my mother
was in such pain that she had no choice but to extract the tooth.
I was nine when my family moved to the U.S. from the
Philippines. Every six months my siblings and I would go to our
dentist and hygienist for our bi-annual check-ups. My sister and
I always had several carious lesions. I did not realize at the time
that it was not just home care, but other multi-factorial issues
that contributed to our dental demise.
In the pursuit of saving my teeth and avoiding the dreaded
denture my mother had, I completed my college education in the
field of dental hygiene, becoming licensed in 1983. I worked
toward my master's degree in a program that challenged me and
helped me find my passion for public awareness of dental hygiene
as the oral health profession. Just thinking about dental decay,
brought up many questions to ponder: Why should enamel, the
hardest substance in the body simply breakdown? Why should a
person need to have the hardest surface in the whole body drilled
open to place a filling? Why should a patient have a nerve removed
from a live tooth? Why should teeth be
extracted? Why should a patient die
because of a dental abscess? These questions
puzzled me since dental disease is
preventable. A more haunting question is
why don't people know that dental disease
is preventable? Why do they believe caries
and periodontal disease are inevitable?
Why is the preventive message of the dental
profession falling on deaf ears?
During this soul-searching time, I was working for a dentist
in Fort Lauderdale. This luxurious and upscale dental practice
faced the Intracoastal Waterway. It was not uncommon to have
families put off regular dental hygiene visits with the excuse they
were too expensive. One family in particular had six children
and by the time all of them had radiographs, prophylaxis and
fluoride, it cost the parents the equivalent of an expensive Prada
purse! Strangely enough, some people would rather buy the
Prada purse than purchase preventive dental care. It was puzzling
to me that my own mother had a matching purse for every
pair of shoes she owned, but in her family growing up, there
wasn't enough money for preventive care. Why is more value
placed on discretionary purchases than on oral health care?
Remarkably, even those with free dental care choose to have
the best shoes and electronic games for their children rather than
pay for preventive services to ensure good oral health. This interest
in prevention provided the foundation for my master's degree
research project. At the request of my adviser, Dr. Inge Ford,
I gathered emergency room data on dental visits in Martin
County, Florida. According to the 2010 Martin County
Community Health Assessment, the most difficult health service
to obtain was dental care. A majority of the respondents, 69
percent, received routine physicals whereas only half received
routine dental exams. Quiñonez (2011) noted that lower and
middle income groups were the populations who reported to the
emergency room for dental emergencies. The lower and middle
income groups earned too much for public support and worked
in jobs that did not offer dental insurance as part of the benefits
package. This combination of circumstances led them to the
emergency room for care rather than paying for regular dental
visits. No value was placed on preventive services.
According to the Martin County Health Assessment, in
2010 there were 243 dentists serving 139,794 people and 9.3
percent were enrolled in Medicaid. However, of those 243 dentists,
only two took Medicare for children up to 21 years of age
and only two clinics perform free services for adults with
Medicare. With such limited number of dentists providing services
for those 22 to 61 years old, many end up in emergency
rooms for routine treatment of dental disease as well as treatment
of painful dental abscesses. Providing dental care for those
with acute disease addresses the immediate need for treatment,
but it doesn't address the need for more valuable prevention
information. With oral health education, these people could
avoid the damage done by caries and periodontal disease and the
need for expensive dental treatment.
There are many preventive oral health programs now available
to educate parents or caregivers of young children, so why
don't people value oral health? Why don't they know dental disease
is preventable? The information is out there and has been
for many years, but the message isn't getting through with our
current educational programs. People would still prefer to buy a
purse than spend money on prevention because they do not see
the value of good oral health.
If people realize that dental disease is preventable and that
parents are the source of Strep mutans in their children's mouths,
values might change. Right now, people don't believe they have
any part in the oral health of their children. They believe dental
disease is inevitable. They have experienced tooth decay and
they fully expect their children to have tooth decay. The concept
of preventing tooth decay is as foreign to parents today as it was
to my grandmother years ago. Despite the dental profession's
efforts to educate people about the dangers of sugar, the importance
of good nutrition and the value of regular dental visits and
daily oral hygiene, many still believe dental disease is inevitable
and only seek dental care in emergency rooms when the disease
has progressed to severe pain.
From my own family experience, the message of the contagiousness
of dental caries was missed. Babies "catch" tooth decay
from their parents and caregivers, from whoever shares saliva
with them. Strep mutans are transmitted via saliva through kissing,
sharing eating utensils and sharing food. Numerous studies
have reported similar Strep mutan genotypes among mother,
father and children and suggest vertical transmission from parent
to child and horizontal transmission between siblings sharing
utensils, straws, glasses and kissing. In Domejéan's study of
unrelated kindergarten children, the risk of caries transmission
was found to be relatively low in one out of six children due to
less contact time amongst each other (2010). My mother's Strep
mutan colonizations and subsequent dental disease was very
likely due to my grandmother's generous sharing of her saliva.
She just didn't know she was also sharing Strep mutans that
would be responsible for future tooth decay.
According to research done by Caufield et al. in 1993, if a
child can avoid exposure to Strep mutans during their first two
years, they have a better chance of establishing a healthy oral
flora rather than one conducive to caries. The best way to do this
is by changing the mother's oral flora so mom shares a healthy
oral flora with her baby. Early childhood caries is known to
strike before the age of two, so waiting until the child is two or
three for their first dental visit may be too late. They might
already need extensive restorative work. The first dental visit for
the child should be during pregnancy to make sure the mother
has good oral health and low Strep mutan levels.
Several research studies have demonstrated the value of mothers
chewing xylitol-sweetened gum three to five times daily to
reduce their Strep mutan levels and consequently, reduce the
chance for colonization in the baby's mouth by fivefold (Soderling
2006, Naki 2010). Intervening early is the best hope of stopping
the caries process that if left unchecked will result in tooth decay,
expensive restorative work and many extractions. In the case of
my mother, it led to full arch extractions and a denture at the age
of 17. Backing up to the point before the Strep mutans colonize
the mouth and the first carious lesions occur is true primary prevention.
Waiting to address the problem when dental decay has
ravaged the mouth and expensive and extensive work is needed is
too late. Early intervention is the key. Had my grandmother
thought about the end result for my mother when her deciduous
teeth first erupted, perhaps my mother could have had healthy
teeth today rather than the denture she has now. The price of early
prevention over a lifetime is worth much more than a purse.
References
- Cohen, L., Bonito, A., Akin, D., Manski, R., Macek, M., Edwards, R., & Cornelius, L. (2008, Sept). Toothache
pain: a comparison of visits to physicians, emergency departments and dentists. Journal of American Dental
Association (JADA), 139(9): 1205-16. Retrieved from http://jada.ada.org/content/139/9/1205.full
- Caufield, P., Cutter, G., Dasanayake, A. (1993). Initial acquisition of mutans streptococci by infants: evidence for
a descrete window of infectivity. J Dent Res 72(1):37-45.
- Ford, personal communication, September, 2010
- Nakai, Y., Shinga-Ishihara, C., Kaji, M. et al (2010). Xylitol gum and maternal transmission of mutans streptococci.
J Dent Res 89(1):56-60
- Quiñonez, C. (2009). Self-reported emergency room visits for dental problems. International Journal of Dental
Hygiene 9(1): 17–20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2009.00416.
- S öderling E. (2009). Xylitol reduces mother-child transmission of mutans streptococci. Finnish Dent J Supplement
1/2006:8-11.
|