Routine implant maintenance is necessary
to maintain peri-implant health and to ensure the long-term success of the implant; however,
implants are susceptible to both peri-implantitis and implant failure. Peri-implantitis is an
inflammatory reaction in the hard and soft tissues, with loss of surrounding supporting bone.²
Implants fail when osseous integration doesn't occur or is destroyed by infection. Peri-implantitis
can be prevented and controlled with routine care by the hygienist.
Proper dental hygiene includes removing microbial deposits without altering the implant
surfaces or adversely affecting biocompatibility.³ Scratches and gouges may affect the titaniumoxide
layer, reducing the corrosion-resistant nature of titanium.4 The implant surface can
become contaminated with trace elements from the curette material that remains, which can
compromise the long-term osseiointegration of the implant.5 Plastic, graphite and titanium
scalers are all within safe limits for instrumenting on implant surfaces. Studies using scanning
electron microscopy showed these implant instruments produced no scratches or gouges on the
implant surface. Recent studies have not evaluated the effectiveness of these instruments for
calculus removal or the effects of instrument debris left on the implant surface.
According to a 1990 Journal of Periodontology study, authors Dmytryk, Fox and Moriarty
state, "Although the use of a plastic curette did not significantly roughen the implant surface…6 there was concern that some of the plastic material may have been smeared or deposited on the
implant surface, perhaps altering the biocompatibility of the titanium surface."7 Dr. Driver, in a
current SEM study noted "Plastic instruments had no effect on the implant surfaces but they did
leave plastic debris that was firmly attached to the surface as if melted or embedded to it." These
research results would lead to the conclusion, more studies are needed to evaluate the effects of
instrument debris left behind on the implant surface and the biocompatibility of this debris with
the titanium implant surface. To prepare for peri-implant challenges, a basic understanding of
the implants is important. The three implant designs you may see are: endosteal, transosteal and
subperiosteal. Endosteal implants are the most frequently utilized implants today in partially and
fully edentulous implant patient treatment to replace a missing tooth or teeth with a final restoration
or abutment attached. Transosteal and subperiosteal are framework implants historically
placed by a surgeon when there is not have enough bone for an endosteal implant. These patients
have extensions that protrude about the gingiva in the form of abutments to
attach to overdentures or fixed bridges. Overdentures are removable partial or
complete dentures, often supported by both implants and tissue. The implant-supported
overdenture provides improved stability, function, speech, comfort
and self image. It is also important to understand that horizontal bone loss
around an implant may appear similar to a pocket; this is to be expected. It
measures only 0.5mm to 1mm and is reasonable in the first year, with an anticipated
stable alveolar level following this initial healing period.8
Calculus deposits are primarily supragingival, softer and easily removed with short vertical
strokes. Care must be taken to avoid scratching or roughening the implant surface, as
this may provide a niche for bacterial accumulation and subsequent inflammation. In the
studies conducted to date, plastic, graphite and titanium scalers are the only recommended
hygiene instruments that did not alter the implant surfaces. Power scalers and air powder
abrasive systems can be used with specific tips, sleeves and powder formulated for implants.9
However, caution must be taken when using a plastic sleeve on a power scalers tip to prevent
aspirate of the plastic tip, should it become dislodged. Stainless steel instruments and
metallic power scaler tips have been shown to gouge or scratch the implant surface and are
therefore contraindicated.10
Every dental office should have at least one go-to implant instrument set for each
hygienist, consisting of the instruments needed to meet all implant maintenance challenges.
These challenges include removing calculus from a variety of implants and restorative
choices. Some are narrow base implants (narrow platform used for lower incisors, congeniality
missing laterals, and area with limited available bone) while others have a wide base or
wide platform. High water bridges as well as full-arch cement or screw retained implants are
difficult to access. Also a small diameter instrument is needed to fit under a Hader clip bar
or around O-ring ball or locator abutments that are used under overdentures.
Currently, implant instruments are plastic-, graphite- or titanium-coated or are solid
titanium. Implant Prophy+ from TESS are manufactured from polycarbonate plastic and
include Gracey and Columbia designs which can be sharpened. Implacare scalers from
Hu-Friedy feature a sturdy handle and plastic disposable tips in several designs. Premier
Dental Facial implant scalers are made of nonmetallic, autoclavable graphite and can be
sharpened. Titanium-coated Suvan-O'Hehir implant scoop curettes are available from G.
Hartzell and Son.
Solid titanium instruments are the most recent addition to the market and are available
from many companies. They are thinner than plastic or graphite instruments and can also
be sharpened. Titanium instruments can be used on like-metal, thus titanium on titanium.11
This advantage provides more strength to dislodge calculus. ImplantPro from Brasseler is
available in the Langer series with replaceable titanium tips. ImplaMate is made by
Nordent, also in the Langer series, Barnhart and Universal scalers. The newest in the market
are the Wingrove Series, made by Paradise Dental Technologies (PDT). These instruments
are available in Nebraska, Langer and Barnhart designs. All are finely adjusted designs
to adapt specifically for peri-implant therapy. Instrumentation of an implant is different
than scaling on a natural tooth. Natural teeth are anchored in the bone by the periodontal
ligament and sulcular epithelium, while implants are osseointegrated, with direct contact
between bone and the dental implant with no sulcus or ligament attachment between bone
and implant. When instrumenting a natural tooth, the instrument blade is adapted to the
tooth surface and gently inserted between the sulcular epithelium and the side of the tooth
or root. Then it is moved to the bottom of the pocket. Vertical, horizontal and oblique
stokes are used to remove calculus deposits.
Based on experience, the ideal implant instrument kit should include a plastic periodontal
probe, an anterior scaler with a short blade length, a posterior scaler with longer blade length and a universal posterior scaler. Selecting the proper instrument to remove calculus
deposits and not harm the implant surface is critical. An anterior implant scaler needs to be
small enough to adapt under a Hader clip bar, around a ball or locator abutment, and to
scale calculus on exposed implant threads. A side-to-side motion should be used to scale
under a Hader clip bar and a short vertical stroke around any anterior ball or locator abutments.
To remove calculus from any exposed threads of an implant (anterior or posterior),
use the side of a shorter radius blade tip and carefully scale in a side-to-side motion, one
thread at a time. For narrow base posterior implants or implants that replace two adjacent
teeth, select a longer bladed instrument to stretch under the more bulbous-shaped crowns
and under framework of a high water bridge or full arch implant retained prosthesis. Short
scaling strokes should be used to dislodge the calculus present on these implants, crowns or
frameworks. For wide-base posterior implants, a universal posterior implant scaler should
be used with short vertical strokes to dislodge the calculus.
For overdenture implant abutment patients, remove the denture and assess the O-rings
or clips inside the denture for loss or wear. Replace O-rings or plastic retention clips if worn
out or replace at least once a year.12
Scale the ball or bar-retained implant abutments with
an anterior scaler in a side-to-side motion under the bar and with short vertical strokes
around the ball abutments. For hygiene maintenance on overdentures, follow routine directions
for proper ultrasonic cleaning and be careful of O-rings or clips.
Understanding various implant designs and having the right instruments for the job
will allow you to provide your patients ideal implant care to ensure the long-term success
of their implants.
References
- 1.Lekholm U, Ericsson I, Adell R, Slots J. The conditions of the soft tissues at tooth and fixture abutments supporting fixed b ridges. A
microbiological and histological study. J Clin Periodontal 1986:13:558-562
- Guy SC, Mc Quade MJ, Scheidt MJ, McPherson JC, Rossmann JA, Van Dyke TE. In vitro attachment of human gingival fibroblasts
to endosseous implants materials. J Periodontal 1993; 64:542-546.
- Meschenmoser A, d'Hoedt B, Meyle J, ElBner G, Korn D, Hammerle H, Schulte W. Effects of Variouis Hygiene Procedures on the
Surface Characteristics of Titanium Abutments. J Periodontal 1996; 67:229-235.
- .Klauber C, Lenz LJ, Henry PJ. Oxide thickness and surface contamination of six endosseous dental implants determined by elect ron
spectroscopy for chemical analysis: a preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:264-271.
- Klauber C, Lenz LJ, Henry PJ. Oxide thichness and surface contamination of six endosseous dental implants determined by elect ron
spectroscopy for chemical analysis: a preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:264-271.
- Fox SC, Moriarty JD, Kusy RP. The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: An in vit ro
study. J Periodontal 1990; 61:485-490.
- Dmytryk JJ, Fox SC, Moriarty JD; The effects of of scaling titanium implant surfaces with metal and plastic Instruments on ce ll
attachment. J Periodontal 1990; 61: 491-496.
- Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry.3rd.St.Louis:Mosby;2008:1061.
- Sato S, KishidaM, Ito K. The comparative effect of ultrasonic scalers on titanium surfaces: an in vitro study. J Periodontal
2004;75(9):1269-1273.
- Hallmon W, Waldrop T, Meffert R, Wade BW. A comparative study of the effects of metallic, nonmetallic, and sonic instrumentation
on titanium surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl. 1997;11(1):96-100.
- Meschenmoser A, d'Hoedt B, Meyle J, ElBner G, Korn D, Hammerle H, Schulte W. Effects of Variouis Hygiene Procedures on the
Surface Characteristics of Titanium Abutments. J Periodontal 1996; 67:229-235.
- Staubli P, Bagley D. Attachments and implants reference manual, 8th ed., San Meteo, CA: Strong Design; 2007:100
|